Tuesday, 7 April 2015

Parting Shots!

The future remains to be seen with changes being pledged to alleviating the haze problem in the Southeast Asian region. To be optimistic is to say that occurrences of haze will be lessened although not completely alleviated, given the recent hazy conditions reported in the northeastern and eastern regions in Singapore in the past month or so.

The 2013 haze outbreak in the region which has had N95 masks sold out all over Singapore and air quality deteriorate so badly and so quickly that nobody even had time to react, is a harsh reminder for everyone to stay prepared and vigilant amidst playing our part in ensuring good air quality. 

We can say that the best things in life are free and we are not wrong. However, they should not be taken for granted for simple and seemingly given things like clean air can be taken away so easily in the blink of an eye or the flicker of a torch to set fire to an entire forest. I am definitely looking forward to clean air and less smoggy scenery and I am sure a lot of us are too. Let us work hand-in-hand, an action definitely inspired by the ASEAN handshake, to strive for a better and brighter (no more particles in the air!) tomorrow!



It's been fun documenting the entire haze pollution process through this blog. It's been a long and arduous journey indeed and well, see everyone during finals! :) 

Friday, 3 April 2015

What should we do in the event of a haze

The haze seems to have become a constant in the region, despite treaties and agreements that wish otherwise. The limited action seen on a national and international front brings an impetus to dealing with the haze at least on an individual basis for the short term.

First, we need to acknowledge that the effects of the haze is different in every individual, depending on the existing health status as well as the level of physical activity undertaken during the period of the haze. The intensity and the frequency of outdoor related activities should see a decline during the period of the haze. This is exemplified via this chart issued by the Ministry of Health Singapore that provides a guideline of activity levels depending on the prevalence or the intensity of the haze.

Above: Haze Health Advisory by Ministry Of Health Singapore on activity level of general population

MOE has issued a press release that circumvents action by schools in the event of a haze. School activities could be "scaled down if necessary" and centres may be closed in kindergartens to secondary schools. However in post-secondary institutions and junior colleges, MOE takes a more advisory role in ensuring the well-being of their students, citing the reasons that most of the classes take place in indoor spaces already and that students are older (MOE, 2013).

Well of course, there is the usual go-to precautionary device called "masks". Singaporeans are generally well-versed in this, judging from the crowd outside pharmacies and designated spots to purchase N95 masks and air purifiers. 

Above: Snaking queue outside Unity Pharmacy to purchase air purifiers

Above: Boxes of N95 masks handed out to the crowd

The Singapore government during the period of the haze had also advised the citizen population to remain indoors as much as possible (more on this later!) and turn on air conditioning as the AC will help filter out the air pollutants (not quite sure on this...). 

Generally speaking, the Singapore population seems to be well-advised in dealing with the haze and its polluting effects. N95 masks for every member of the household have arrived in the mail soon after the haze episode after stocks were replenished in order to prepare society for another outbreak. Air purifiers have also increased their stock and range at local hardware shops. I would suggest that we skip the risk and get an air purifier for home. The said benefits are aplenty but its effectiveness on a ground level remains to be seen for there has yet to be another haze episode as severe for real-time testing of the equipment. In the mean time, let us hope that our air purifiers will collect some dust because really, we don't need another PS1 400 haze outbreak ever. 

Saturday, 28 March 2015

Geopolitical Struggles in Tackling the Southeast Asian Haze

The struggles faced by Indonesia in tackling the problem of the haze extend to the regional level as the inherent international geopolitical debates pertaining to the issue hinder the concretisation of efficient action plans. 

Once again referring to Varkley's (2013) work, she accredits the region's inability to effectively find a resolution to the problem to the patronage politics in the sector, which is connected to the ASEAN style of regional engagement that prioritises the maintenance of national sovereignty. As the mouthpiece of civil society in an international arena, states are compelled to act in their national interests, as opposed to the collective regional interests. This is being exemplified in the excerpts of the agreement below: 




To go back to an earlier post on the benefits arising from the haze, we identify the economic importance of the oil palm sector to the country along with the political importance of the clients populating this sector to elite patrons in the governments. This meant that the maintenance of the status quo, where the clients could continue to engage in their deforesting ways, was of crucial national interest. Herein, the ASEAN style of regional engagement has evidently enabled the political elites to shape ASEAN initiatives to preserve the interests of their clients, while the general public in Indonesia as well as in the region continue to suffer the haze.

Having read this, it is easy to put the blame on ASEAN as a regional organisation being not as forceful as it should have been in order to protect the health of Southeast Asia. However, there are considerations to be made to avoid such rash and brash opinions -the sovereignty of the state being foremost. The applicability of the principle to other policies and agreements have also acted as a mediator in the amount of pressure being doled out to Indonesia. That being said, now that Indonesia has finally ratified the agreement, the effectiveness of this move remains to be seen. 


Saturday, 21 March 2015

Political Struggles In Tackling Haze Pollution

Indonesia is a large country with many layers of bureaucracy (and perhaps corruption) that is foreign to Singapore. This makes it difficult to coordinate policies and form agreements which benefits the civil society.  

According to Varkkey (2013), one key obstacle in the tackling of the transboundary haze problem would be the importance of patronage networks within the oil palm sector in Indonesia, especially in terms of knowledge and access to local markets, distribution systems, connections around local bureaucracy and business systems (Terjesen and Elam, 2009). Because of this, it has become the norm at least among the top tiers of the Indonesian plantation firms to possess a two-tier management structure that comprises of the board of directors and board of commissioners. Officially the former manages and represents the company and the latter supervises the directors (Rajenthran, 2002). However in reality, members of the board of commissioners and sometimes the board of directors are typically retired senior bureaucrats who could act as intermediaries with the state and perform "advisory and brokerage functions" on behalf of the company. This means that several political parties in power have direct links to those plantation interests and have the potential to encourage elites to favour arrangements that ensure domestic and regional political economic stability and market access to these natural resources, while providing a lack of incentives for effective regional environmental conservation.

Another pertinent struggle of reducing the occurrences and the severity of haze in the region would be resistances that are present at a ministerial level. There is a dearth of mutual cooperation among Indonesia's domestic institutions (Nguitragool, 2011), resulting in a hierarchy among government ministries in Indonesia. The Ministries of Forestry and Agriculture are the more powerful ministries, with greater mandate, manpower and financial resources (Tan, 2004). Even if the Environment Ministry has been the engine of Indonesia's environmental diplomacy and holds the mandate to negotiate environmental treaties, its officials barely wield decision-making authority over land and forest policy at the state level. They remain a junior ministry, unable to sway their higher-ups in favour of environmental policy.

Is this corruption? It seems like it when one compares this to the Singaporean way of governance where ministries possess equal power in swaying the House's final decisions. Ministries should be given equal power and bear foresight to implement policies that benefit civil society, not only within the home region but the region as well. No man is an island, and no country is one either.


References:
Nguitragool, P. (2011). Negotiating the Haze Treaty. Asian Survey, 51(2), 356-378. 
Rajenthran, A. (2002). Indonesia: An overview of the legal framework of foreign direct investment. Paper presented at the ISEAS Working Papers: Economics and Finance, Singapore.
Varkley, H. (2013). Patronage politics, plantation fires and transboundary haze. Environmental Hazards. 
Terjesen, S & Elam, A. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurs' venture internationalization strategies: A practice theory approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1093-1116.  
Tan, A.K. J. (2004). Environmental laws and institutions in Southeast Asia: A review of recent developments. Singapore Year Book of International Law, 8, 177-192. 

Friday, 13 March 2015

Indonesia's Efforts to Tackle the Haze Problem

As the established key contributor of both episodes of the SEA Haze (through scientific data and admittance), Indonesia has recently ratified the ASEAN Agreement against Transboundary Haze Pollution although its effectiveness remains to be seen. However to Indonesia's credit, this is not their only concerted effort in trying to reduce the haze.

At a state level, Indonesia has laws against illegal burning but these laws are a weak deterrent due to poor enforcement by a "junior ministry" within Indonesian politics. There is a misalignment of incentives due to the incongruence between civic welfare and economic returns. Nonetheless, there are indications of growing political will by Indonesian heavyweights. President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono had declared a war against the haze in 2006 and according to The Economist, he has been "uncommonly courageous" in protecting the environment. In 2009, he had pledged to cut carbon emissions by at least 26% by 2020. This promise being made on an international platform is significant because most of Indonesia's carbon dioxide emissions are a consequence of deforestation. In 2011, the President had also imposed a two-year moratorium on granting forest clearing concessions under Norway's $1 billion Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation-Plus programme. He had also extended this moratorium till 2013 in spite of vast pressures from naysayers to the policies. 

I don't want to be pessimistic but can we just say that while it is great that Indonesia is cooperative at the very least, this cooperation and the promises by the President seemed to have little effect against the overall haze situation, given its reoccurrence on a yearly basis. Either they are hitting the wrong spots or what is being done is too little to mitigate against the prevalence of the haze. The following blog posts on the political and geopolitical struggles on haze prevention will elucidate this to greater detail. 

Saturday, 7 March 2015

International Efforts to Tackle the Haze

Eluded by the term "trans-boundary haze", the problem of haze pollution is not confined to just the country releasing the pollutants nor the countries affected. The major players in the world have gotten involved in discussions to resolve the haze with both incentives and aid being provided to Indonesia as well as the affected countries.

In 1997, the foreign minister of Myanmar who headed the Environmental Affairs at the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) at the time suggested that the haze mitigation efforts should be carried out at the regional level due to its transboundary nature, its extreme effect on society and its close relationship to natural resource management in the region. ASEAN member countries unanimously supported this as an opportunity to address the public's concerns. 

This manifested in the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution in 2002 where a pledge was being made to reduce haze pollution in Southeast Asia. The general obligations of the agreement states that the Parties shall:

"1. Co-operate in developing and implementing measures to prevent and monitor transboundary haze pollution as a result of land and/or forest fires which should be mitigated, and to control sources of fires, including by the identification of fires, development of monitoring, assessment and early warning systems, exchange of information and technology, and the provision of mutual assistance. 

2. When the transboundary haze pollution originates from within their territories, respond promptly to a request for relevant information or consultations sought by a State or States that are or may be affected by such transboundary haze pollution, with a view to minimising the consequences of the transboundary haze pollution. 

3. Take legislative, administrative and/or other measures to implement their obligations under this Agreement. "

Over the years, though ASEAN has not seen much success given the absence of Indonesia from the agreement, in October 2013 leaders have approved a joint haze monitoring system and Singapore has offered to start working directly with Indonesian farmers to encourage sustainable practices and minimise the problem by "tackling the haze issue at its root" (Straits Times, 2014). Perhaps it is coincidental, but actual policy implementations seemed to have only come after the 2013 haze outbreak where PSI values broke previous records and shocked the region into action. The impetus of haze prevention might have surfaced even greater and hence propelled nations (Indonesia included) into bring the agreement from the policy level to the ground for political reasons perhaps. 

References 
Strait Times. (2014) Singapore willing to work with Indonesia, Malaysia to tackle causes of haze




Sunday, 1 March 2015

Haze Formation in Indonesia

All this talk about the effects and the geopolitical debates has nearly led me to forget one of the most fundamental questions in this discussion -how. What resulted in the 2013 haze as well as the 1997 episode and how did they reach their ground-breakingly hazardous levels?


In Indonesia, peat land fires are by far the largest contributor to smoke haze pollution. In 1997/98, peat land fires have contributed between 60-90% of the emissions resulting in smoke haze and they were also the The need for burning stems from the recent oil palm expansion, which refers to the profitability of growing and selling oil palm products. Increased demand has driven the expansion and deforestation of land at a scale no one has ever seen before. Where the culprits are not the large-scale investors, clearing the land by setting on fire the plantation becomes the most cost efficient and fastest method, despite its non-legal nature. A succinct explanation of the chemical processes behind forest fires is being made in this video from 0:25 to 0:50Click here!


We say that forest fires are the largest contributing factor the haze because it releases large amounts of particulate matter comprising of carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulate matter. These are poisonous and do not blend into the air in a homogeneous manner thereby contributing to their stay within the atmosphere for long periods of time, leading to impairment of visibility and the afore-mentioned negative effects on the health and lifestyles of the living population. 

A crucial supporting factor in the formation of haze within Southeast Asia is the lack of proper and efficient governance. While there are legal obligations being put in place at a state level, these policies do not always take into consideration what happens on the ground and the fact that large scale concessions are often being handed out, the problem of the haze often persists despite structural legalities. 

Evidently, the haze in Southeast Asia is not just the result of one but many triggers. This has implications for the resolution of these hotspots (hah!) of problems, which will be fleshed out to a deeper extent in subsequent entries.

Thursday, 19 February 2015

Is there anything good about the haze?

Surely there are two sides of the coin when it comes to the haze. We have been distinctly negative about the entire phenomenon, as with majority of the stakeholders and southeast Asian region. However, let's backtrack a bit today and examine the positive and possibly beneficial effects of the haze.

"Benefits" of the haze (www.dontlikethatbro.blogspot.com)

As established previously, the haze results from the burning of oil plantations by medium-sized corporations. This is in pursuit of financial gains which ideally then contributes to the Indonesian economy and therefore the global economy. Deforestation fulfils a demand for these oil plantation products some locally, others internationally. The global market for palm oil has experienced rapid growth in recent decades. Indonesia is one of the world's largest producers and exporters of palm oil, producing over 18 million tonnes of palm oil annually (World Growth, 2011).

According to World Growth 2011, oil plantation products comprise a huge percentage of the Indonesian GDP. For the last decade, palm oil has been Indonesia's most significant agricultural export.

Percentage share of Palm oil among Indonesia's agricultural production.

It is a figment of national identity, a constant way of life. Just as tourism is as pertinent to Singapore's economy with its mega contributions to the overall GDP, oil plantations are that way in an Indonesian context. While yes, environmental and health concerns are at stake but if perceived from an angle from one of national identity and perhaps even sustenance, then haze becomes a contested issue with regards to the benefits it can possibly bring.

Also somehow somewhere, the practice of this burning is somebody's livelihood and it might be keeping them off the streets. It might be putting rice bowls on their tables for an entire family. In 2006, it was found that 1.7 to 2 million people worked in the palm oil industry. Palm oil production provides a reliable form of income for a large number of Indonesia's rural poor, with one source suggesting that employment generated from palm oil production in Indonesia could potentially reach over 6 million lives and take them out of poverty. I'm not saying it is legitimate to burn oil plantations nor lead to plausible extinctions of rare flora and fauna, but it is a job and we must consider the possible economic salvations to this matter besides advocating its demise.

Nothing is ever definite. Even what seemed to be as blatantly hazardous as the southeast Asian haze suddenly bears a more humanistic realm now that livelihoods and percentage GDP is taken into consideration. No one is advocating for the goodness of the smog and the pollution entailed by the burning and neither is anyone (even the frontline loggers) really in a mood for a celebration of the haze when they can't breathe. But perhaps what this teaches us is the need to look beyond the smoke and realise the wider context this phenomenon lends to.

References:
The Economic Benefit of Palm Oil To Indonesia. (2011) A Report by World Growth (Link here!)

Sunday, 15 February 2015

In the news: Slight haze in north-eastern and eastern Singapore

Aside from the thematic concerns with regard to the haze in Southeast Asia that I'll be discussing, I would also like to add to the discussion by bringing to light new articles which I find are of relevance to the haze and air quality in the region. 

Link to articles: http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/johor-fires-possible-cause-haze-and-odour-nea and https://sg.news.yahoo.com/pollutants-index--pm2-5--spikes-to-155-in-east-area-of-singapore-011416765.html?linkId=12329116


"Light haze" in Sengkang as a result of Johor landfill fire

Quick summary: A light haze and burnt smell was reported in the north-eastern regions Sengkang, Hougang and Serangoon as well as the eastern parts of Bedok, Siglap, Pasir Ris and East Coast Road earlier this week. This was found to be a result of a fire at a landfill site in southern Johor. Malaysian authorities are still trying to resolve the problem, of which Singapore had offered help too, if required. 

Reflection: A description of "light haze" seems to be pushing it for apparent from the picture above, a description of "Silent Hill has descended upon Sengkang" would be more likely! But jokes aside, this slight episode exposes Singapore's vulnerability to activities in neighbouring countries. The haze this time round was brought upon by one incident of fire, what is more to say about the mass burning of forests that took place in 2013? I'd like to address the scale of events here and draw attention to the fact that our air quality is in actual fact a precarious reality that must never be taken for granted. While the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution, now with Indonesia's cooperation (its recent ratification will be discussed in the upcoming weeks!), has been in place since 2002, we do expect for caution to be exercised when it comes to possible haze pollution incidences. However, slippages and accidental fires do occur for complete governmentality of firms and practices within a nation is impossible. What I feel is of utmost importance in scenarios like this would be the exercise of geopolitical responsibility and cooperation by neighbouring countries to clear up the air and not for blame to be accorded impulsively and irrationally. What Environment and Water Resources Minister Vivian Balakrishnan added to his Facebook statement that "We stand ready to assist if requested" is good example of international prudence and neighbourliness. Unlike popular wishes, haze pollution exceeds the territorial boundaries of a nation and it is the impetus of nations to accede to their responsibilities of the ASEAN treaty for all it is worth. 

Monday, 9 February 2015

Environmental Impacts of Haze Pollution.

While the economic and health impacts of the haze are apparent and definitely can be deadly, the marine, atmospheric and ecological effects of the haze must be addressed as well, for the Earth functions in a circuit where every environmental system is inter-linked. This necessitates the elucidation of effects on a holistic basis for a concise determination of the consequences of the haze (other than the fact that this is an environmental pollution module).

Here is an overview of the negative impacts of the haze:

Image taken from the Division of Environmental Science and Engineering, NUS


1. Marine Impacts

While the health, economic and land-based as well as atmospheric issues of this burning have been well-documented, the impact on marine ecosystems has been almost wholly ignored. Here, we examine what Jeremy Hance, resident contributor of mongabay.com, a renowned environmental news commentary site has to say about the marine impacts.

He notes that the Southeast Asian region houses the Coral Triangle, the global epicentre of marine biodiversity and the most biodiverse marine region on the planet which is home to over 600 species of reef-building corals and 2000 reef fish. However this stronghold in biodiversity stands to be under threat, according to Zeehan Jaafar who is a marine researcher with the National University of Singapore and Tse-Lynn Loh with the John G. Shedd Aquarium in their new opinion paper in Global Change Biology. They warned that the haze from the land-based fires that has largely been originating from Indonesia as of late, could decrease sunlight to these precious marine ecosystems, perhaps undercutting photosynthesis in coral reefs as well as mangroves and sea grass. Meanwhile, runoff and topsoil loss due to fires may lead to eutrophication in marine environments. This would cause a massive loss in species abundance and diversity. Furthermore, land runoff could also lead to sediment loading in marine ecosystems, which can cause coral bleaching. These researchers also warn that the deposition of manifold particulates of various compounds such as carbon, ammonia and nitrogen into the ocean is with uncertain consequences upon various ecosystems.

Till today, we do not know the final consequence upon the marine environment and perhaps the unknown might be what we are most direly afraid of (mass poisoning of food supplies across the globe? Extinction of species?). However, that reality might not be as distant as we imagine, for it had been documented that after the 1997 Indonesian Smoke Haze, there was coral reef death at the Mentawai Islands (located off-shore of southwest Sumatra, Indonesia). It had been reported by Nerlie et al (Science, vol 301) that 1.1 x 10^4  metric tons of Iron was released from the Sumatran wildfies. This was linked to the disappearance of the red tide at the Mentawai region.

2. Atmospheric Impacts

Indonesian forest fires have had significant impacts on regional air quality due to the release of gaseous and particulate pollutants in copious amounts. The forest fires, particularly those raging in carbon-dense peatlands, represent a huge spike in greenhouse gases that sends Indonesia into the uppermost bracket of worldwide polluters. It was estimated that the July 2013 fires in Riau emitted between 36 million and 49 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. The burning of the forests and peatlands in 2013 had undermined Indonesia's effort to achieve a 26% reduction in emissions by 2020.

In 1999, it was found that primary pollution emissions may either be short- or long-lived. Short-lived primary pollution emissions from the burning of oil plantations and peatlands only affects only regional air quality, whereas the latter upsets the global balance of radiation energy in the atmosphere. The short-lived compounds last for a matter of hours up to several months and these gases can be hazardous, especially when they are in high concentration and close to their source. Chief examples are sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides.

The long-lived category includes gases that can outlast a century. Examples of which are carbon dioxide, methane and chlorofluorocarbons. Owing to their slow removal rate, they accumulate in the atmosphere, and they disperse globally because large-scale mixing typically takes months within a hemisphere to a year between hemispheres. Because these gases absorb infrared radiation, less of this energy is being transmitted into space and leads to what is more commonly known as the greenhouse effect. 

3. Loss of biodiversity

Haze pollution has harmful effects on biodiversity. Let's use plants as an example of the ecological destruction the haze brings. Air pollutants can affect materials by soiling or chemical deterioration. High smoke and particulate levels are associated with soiling of clothing and structures. Pollutants which are known as phytotoxicants (substances harmful to vegetation) are sulfur dioxide, perosyacetyl nitrate (an oxidation product in photochemical smog) and ethylene. In general, these gaseous pollutants enter the plant with air through the stomata in the course of respiration and once in the leaf of the plant, pollutants destroy chlorophyll and disrupt photosynthesis. Damage can rage form a reduction in growth rate to complete death of the plant. Here, we are discussing the impacts on plants that are not within the palm oil plantations in Indonesia. They may be located in the peripheral regions and neighbouring countries, often which too bear the consequences of the haze. 

The loss of biodiversity at the logging site is obvious. What kind of organism can survive the fires? Done at large for a long period of time, extinction by some species may happen.
The deforestation process in Riau; Source: greenpeaceblogs.org

References:
Zeehan Jaafar, Tse-Lynn Loh. (2014) Linking land, air and sea: potential impacts of biomass burning and the resultant haze on marine ecosystems of Southeast Asia. Global Change Biology

Wednesday, 4 February 2015

Health and Economic Effects of the Haze

According to the Health Promotion Board (2013), the main air pollutant would be particulate matter. Particulate matter refers to a complex mix of extremely small particles and liquid droplets made up of a number of components, including acids, organic chemicals, metals and soil or dust particles. Those found in haze are termed "fine particles" and tend to about 2.5 micrometers in diameter or even smaller (EPA, 2013). They're pretty small so can you imagine how easily we inhale these particles?!

While much of the focus of the effects of haze is on the most vulnerable (read: young children, women and the elderly), the "healthier" individuals are far from being spared. Short term exposure over a period of days to high levels of haze particles may cause irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat in them too! In people who already have chronic heart or lung diseases such as asthma or heart failure, consequences of the haze are surely more dire. One doctor who runs a private clinic in Singapore, and who didn't wish to be identified reiterates in the Southeast Asian Wall Street Journal (2013), "This is likely to be bad for anybody who is immuno-compromised or has heart or respiratory ailments." However, he assured that the haze itself should not result in too many long-term health issues, unless it stays for a long period. 

If you had noticed however, these effects are over a period of days. The 2013 Southeast Asian haze had lasted more than a month so just imagine the health effects! Exact figures for the health effects for the 2013 Southeast Asian haze were not readily available so let us just use the 1997 figures by Shanta Christina Emmanuel, a member of the Family Health Service in the Ministry of Health in Singapore on her general lecture on the "Impact to lung health of haze from forest fires: A Singapore experience"as a benchmark. Findings from the health impact surveillance during the 1997 haze period showed that there was a 30% increase in attendances for haze-related conditions and there was an increase in accident and emergency attendances for haze-related complaints. Putting two and two together, the effects from the 2013 haze must have been much worse, given the higher levels of toxicity within the atmosphere.

This video by the Tan Tock Seng hospital provides a concise explanation of the health effects of the haze. Have a look!



Aside from health effects, the haze has caused the affected countries, including Singapore, $9bn. According to the International Business Times in the article "Singapore Haze: Smog May Cost Economy More than 1997 Pollution Crisis", a number of businesses have been forced to close and there are sustained fears about the impact on Singapore's tourism industry as visitors stay away because of health concerns. Tourism accounts for 4% of Singapore's GDP and is worth around $18bn to the economy. 

Saturday, 31 January 2015

A Reminder of the 2013 Southeast Asian Haze and Who Is to Blame

The gravity of the 2013 Southeast Asian haze resonates with many of us simply because we haven't seen anything so bad ever. While the occasional bad air is not uncommon here because of the wind direction and the slash-and-burn practices that characterise much of the Indonesian agricultural scene, the effects of these practices in 2013 have never been more apparent. It literally took "bad air" to a whole different level.

But for the benefit of those who aren't quite clear what it is about, the 2013 Southeast Asian haze was a haze crisis that affected primarily the Southeast Asian countries during June-July 2013. It was a notorious event in the history of both Singapore and Malaysia for it had caused record high levels of pollution. According to the BBC News (2013), the 3-hour Pollutions Standards Index (PSI) in Singapore had reached a record high of 401 on 21 June 2013, surpassing the previous record of 226 during the 1997 Southeast Asian haze. Any value above that of 300 is hazardous where even healthy persons should take precautionary measures. Here are some pictures of the haze:

Slash-and-burn practices in Riau, Indonesia
Visibility reduced, among other side effects of the 2013 SEA haze


A bleak outlook on the haze.  
When low-level winds from the southeast or southwest during the June-september dry season brings smoke from forests being burned in Sumatra and Borneo islands to clear land for palm plantations, into neighbouring countries is coupled with the lack of rain in the region, health atrocities of the haze, along with the region's displeasure and discomfort are heightened. A longstanding blame game between nations resurfaced, with much of popular media's "hate" being directed at Indonesia as one can imply from this clip from the local mock-umentary, The Noose:




But is it really? Is it fair to accord the blame to an entire nation or would a more realistic accusation centre around particular individuals or organisations instead? Even in Indonesia, according to this CNN article just this year (The Air Pollution that's Choking Asia), "The exchange (between a group of farmers and environmental activists) underscores the long-running debate across southeast Asia about who, exactly, is responsible for Indonesia's peat fires. Farmers and environmental groups often accuse companies, many of which are headquartered in Singapore or Malaysia, of malfeasance. But many companies say such criticism is overblown, and that they have largely reformed their destructive land-clearing practices in recent years through voluntary reform initiatives like the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, an industry-led consortium."

Till now, this geopolitical debate is ongoing because blame cannot be accorded quickly nor is there an organisation or entity with sufficient international clout to do so; but fret not, I will address it to the best of my ability in a greater depth in the coming weeks. :)

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

Clearing the Air (Definitions)

If we are going to spend the next 10 weeks talking about the excessive smog as a contributor of air pollution then we had better clear the air (hah!) with regard to the definitions of these terms.

Air pollution may be defined as any atmospheric conditions in which certain substances are present in such concentrations that they can produce undesirable effects on man and his environment. These substances include gases such as sulfur oxides and hydrocarbons, particulate matter such as smoke and dust, radioactive materials and many others.

Smog is a type of air pollutant that gives rise to what is more commonly recognized as "The Haze". It's more scientific term, "smog" was a portmanteau of the words smoke and fog to refer to smoky fog caused by the burning of coal or forests, photochemical smog, transport emissions and other natural causes like volcanic eruptions where large amounts of sulfur dioxide and particulate matter are released into the atmopshere.

While these definitions function as a good clue-in to the deeper geopolitical issues I'll be embarking on come the following entries, they by no means are exhaustive definitions, for the variety of matter emitted into the atmosphere by natural and anthropogenic sources is so diverse that it is difficult to classify air pollutants and the components of smog neatly.

Happy hump day everyone! Here are some memes to brighten up your Wednesday! But in all seriousness, these memes were social media's reaction to the 2013 Southeast Asian Haze and they portray the scale and severity of the issue at hand. We'll talk more about these responses next time! :)






Friday, 23 January 2015

Hazing (grazing) the Surface on Haze

Skies here in Singapore appear to be clear today but according to the latest PSI updates at http://www.haze.gov.sg/home, the 24-hour PSI apparently stands at 59-64, depending on what region of the country you are in. This is only at a moderate level. Not "good" but definitely not life-threatening per se.

What does this mean for us now and in the future? The 2013 Southeast Asian Haze got the entire region and perhaps the world, on alert with regards to the haze and while that caught us by surprise, we definitely are in a better place to tackle similar issues. Or are we? This is what I'll be exploring in this space over the next 10-11 weeks. How does smog, or what is more commonly known as "The Haze" affect us; where does it originate, why it is so hard to rid of and ultimately what ridding of "The Haze" entails. Don't worry, it isn't all dry academic kibble. There will be videos, pictures and cartoons (if you're the type) too to help us gain a deeper understanding of the geopolitical issue (an interesting one too!) and hopefully, to quote Prof David Taylor, by the evaluation date become haze experts! :)

Can't wait!

Sources of Information:
http://www.haze.gov.sg/home